Sunday, November 2, 2014

Jesus, the Passover Lamb, Luke 22: 7-20



 Today we find ourselves looking at a passage of scripture which is the basis for a ceremony which is part of one of the most controversial doctrines in the history of the church.  It was one of the primary points of dispute in the Reformation.  Consequently, it has the distinction of being a major contributing factor in the separation of many denominations.  I’m talking, of course, about the Lord’s Supper, or Communion. 

For hundreds of years, many theologians and preachers a whole lot smarter than I am have debated this issue, and so I don’t pretend to have solved every difficulty in this passage for us today.  However, I am assured of the fact that Jesus said that they that worship God must worship Him in Spirit and in truth.  I am also convinced that the scripture says  in John 16:13, "But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come.”  That principle is repeated elsewhere as well, which promises that we may know the essential truth of God’s word.  We may not know every mystery, but we can know the things freely given to us by God that are essential to our salvation and our sanctification, if we come to the word of God with a humble heart desiring God’s wisdom. 

That desire to know the truth has been the driving force of my ministry.  It is a commitment that I made before the Lord 30 years ago, that if He would show me the truth, I would follow it.  And it continues to be the driving impetus of my preaching and teaching today in this church.  I do not want to be guilty of blindly following tradition.  I do not want to merely regurgitate the status quo, without doing my own research and study to see if those things are so.  I believe that the truth is important, and nothing less than the truth will serve the gospel.

So to that end, that we might know the truth and worship God in truth, we will look at this important passage today first of all from a historical perspective – what happened as the context tells us, and then from a doctrinal perspective – what this passage teaches us in light of how we are to observe Christ’s instructions.

First of all, note that the text makes it clear that this was the beginning of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which is also called the Passover.  All that transpires here in the upper room happens in the context of the disciples and Jesus celebrating and observing the Passover.  Christ does not institute a new ritual.  He takes an old ritual and establishes a new covenant.  He modifies the old ritual, He changes the meaning of the old ceremony, but it’s essentially the same Passover ceremony.

But before we go into the specifics of what the Passover feast entails, let’s consider the preparation that is detailed in vs. 7-13.  Much detail is given by Luke about the selection of a room and the instructions Jesus gave Peter and John concerning it.  There seems to be a certain degree of secrecy about the instructions.  Jesus could have said “just go to such and such a street, and it’s the third house on the left.”  That would be the normal way to give directions.  But Jesus gives them this almost clandestine arrangement; you will see a man with a water pot, go follow this man to his house and so forth.  And if you have a curious mind you should be asking yourself why the subterfuge?  Jesus obviously knows the place He intends to observe the Passover, why not just come out and say it?

Well, you should remember from the preceding passage that Judas went to the chief priests and agreed to betray Jesus when the crowd was not around.  He was looking for the right opportunity when Jesus was out of the public eye so that he could alert the chief priests, and they could send a mob of soldiers and arrest Him without a lot of fanfare.  So Jesus answers the disciples question about where they will hold the feast without giving away the location.  Only Peter and John will go there, and they will not know where it is until they see this man carrying a water pitcher.  By the way, that was not as common a sight as you might think.  This was typically the thing women did, carrying pitchers of water on their heads.  So to see a man do it would attract their notice. 

So the point was to avoid giving the information to Judas before the time that God had appointed Jesus to be betrayed.  Jesus knew the hour that God had appointed, and that all the events that would happen had to occur in such a time frame so that He would be crucified during the time that the Passover lambs were being slain, around 3pm on Friday.  It was now Thursday morning. 

Furthermore, Jesus wanted to observe the Passover Feast with His disciples.  It will be the last opportunity for Him to teach them and pray with them and show them things that will become foundational to the church after He is gone.  And so Jesus gives Peter and John instructions about the location and the preparation in such a way so that Judas was unaware of the essential details. 

So after everything is ready, and Peter and John have prepared everything, vs. 14 says the hour had come to eat the Passover meal.  He reclined at the table with the apostles.  I’m sure most of you are familiar with the significance of the Passover.  But it might be helpful to review it for a moment.  The Passover was a meal that was prescribed by God for the Israelites when they were about to leave Egypt for the Promised Land.  As you will recall, the Lord had brought plagues upon the Egyptians because they refused to let the children of Israel leave Egypt.  The last of 10 plagues was that the eldest son of every family in Egypt would be killed.  And so to protect His people, God gave the Israelites specific instructions to slay a lamb and put the blood of the lamb upon the doorposts of their home so that when the angel of death came through the land, he would pass over those houses where the blood was on the doorpost. 

Then the members of the house were to take the meat of the lamb and cook it in just a certain way, and they were to prepare unleavened bread, and bitter herbs and eat this meal in preparation for their journey.  In Exodus 12 all of the details of the meal are explained, and it states that this was to be a perpetual feast for the Israelites, that they would remember the deliverance by God from their enslavement in generations to come. 

So this is the meal that the apostles and Jesus are observing.  It is the Passover meal.  It was an important festival that they observed every year - for one week a year they ate unleavened bread. They were to remove all leaven from their houses during this time which symbolized a time of self examination and repentance from sin.  And then on the afternoon or evening of the Passover day, they would sacrifice a year old lamb at the temple by the hand of the priest, and bring back the body which they would roast in fire with all the entrails and head and so forth intact, and they would eat the lamb.  Everything that was not eaten had to be burned, so that nothing was left until morning.  And as time went on the Israelites  developed an intricate order, or seder it was called, of the Passover meal which was interspersed with the singing of certain Psalms and prayers and recounting  the story of the exodus. 

Now at the beginning of this Passover meal, Jesus says in vs. 15, ““I have earnestly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer; for I say to you, I shall never again eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.”  First of all, it is worth noting that Jesus says He was fervently, or earnestly desiring to eat this Passover with them before He suffered.  Not only does this indicate His love for His disciples, but it indicates that Jesus was passionately focused on His purpose.  He came to Earth to suffer and die for the sins of the world.  This was His mission, His goal.  And He says He has been eagerly looking forward to it.  He doesn’t have some morbid desire to die, He has a divine desire to liberate mankind; to accomplish the redemption of mankind. That was His earnest desire; to save men from their sins.  And Jesus saw the Passover as the end goal of His mission on Earth; to provide Himself as the Passover Lamb, to save mankind from the penalty of death.

Also in this verse we have another significant principle that is often overlooked.  Jesus is saying that this meal not only looks back at the historic deliverance from Egyptian slavery, but it also looks forward to being consummated or fulfilled in the kingdom of God.  What they were doing then was symbolic of what would one day be fully, or completely realized in the kingdom of God. 

One day there will another feast when the kingdom of God comes in glory.  The Bible refers in Rev. 19:19 to it as the marriage supper of the Lamb.  And so to some extent then what was being celebrated not only looked back at the exodus from Egypt, the freedom from bondage to the promised land, but also looks forward to the future freedom from the presence of sin, the freedom from the bondage of sin that this world is under when we are delivered from this body of death to the glorified, eternal life with Christ.

Then in vs. 17, Jesus formally begins the meal by giving thanks, and offering up the cup He said, “Take this and share it among yourselves; for I say to you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine from now on until the kingdom of God comes.”  Now we see Christ with the cup here, and then after the bread we see the cup again.  Actually, traditionally there were four cups that were offered in the meal.  But once again, the future fulfillment of this symbolism in the kingdom of God is what Jesus is emphasizing.  Twice Jesus emphasizes the future fulfillment of the glorification of the church at the marriage supper of the Lamb.  There was a past fulfillment in Egypt which was symbolized.  And we will look in a moment at the present fulfillment in Christ’s death that was realized.  But twice Christ has emphasized the future fulfillment that is prophesied. That is important. But unfortunately, it’s one that I have never really heard emphasized very much as a part of the meaning of the meal.

Now in vs. 19 we come to the part that is more well known. When Jesus had taken the bread and given thanks, He said, “This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me.”  To the Jews, the unleavened bread was emblematic of the bread of affliction.  It was bread that did not have time to rise because of their haste in leaving Egypt.  It was the bread of captivity, of pain and suffering as slaves.  But Jesus inserts into the ceremony here a startling statement.  He says, “this is My body which is given for you, do this in remembrance of Me.” 

Now this statement has been the cause of much controversy.  There are some who view this statement as a literal declaration that the bread becomes the host of Christ, the actual body of Christ that is eaten.  The Roman Catholics believe that it becomes the actual body of Christ as the priest blesses it and gives it to the recipient.  It’s called transubstantiation.  Protestants, born out of the Reformation, tend to believe that it is symbolic of the body of Christ, but does not actually contain His body. 

Jesus says something similar in regards to the wine.  Luke says in vs. 20, “And in the same way He took the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in My blood.”  Once again the literalists take this to mean that the wine becomes the actual blood of Christ.

I don’t want to get bogged down in all the minutia of every denominational distinction, but I would simply point you back to the historical precedent as a help to understanding what this means.  First of all, the Passover meal was symbolic of an actual historical event.   It was a way of remembering the passing over of the death angel during the last plague upon the Egyptians.  It was a celebration of their deliverance. 

But in this meal Jesus is changing that historical symbolism to mean that He is the Passover Lamb that was slain, whose blood was spread over our house, so to speak, so that we might be free from the fear of death and the penalty of death that is upon all the Earth. 1 Corinthians 5:7 says, “Clean out the old leaven so that you may be a new lump, just as you are in fact unleavened. For Christ our Passover also has been sacrificed.”   Paul makes it clear that Jesus is the Passover Lamb, and yet we understand that is a metaphorical statement.  The Passover lamb symbolizes Christ.

What I find interesting in this is that there is no mention of lamb being eaten in the gospel account of the Lord’s Supper.  But Paul says that He is the Passover Lamb, and yet Jesus says that He is the bread.  It’s interesting because Paul says clean out the old leaven, so that you may be unleavened; he’s talking about the unleavened bread in one breath and then the Passover Lamb in the next.  Paul connects the two.  So what is going on here? 

Well the answer might be that when Jesus became the Passover Lamb, there would be no more sacrificial lambs offered up in the new covenant.  He was the last One.  Something far greater than the blood of animals was offered on Friday; the blood of Jesus Christ is the final sacrifice for sins.  And so the veil to the Holy of Holies was torn in two during His crucifixion.  And when the temple was destroyed just 35 years later as He had prophesied, there was an end to the temple sacrifices.  In the new covenant, there would be no more lambs offered at an altar.  We don’t eat lamb in the celebration of the Lord’s Supper because there can be no more sacrificial lambs.  We don’t worship in a temple made with hands.  We don’t have an earthly priesthood to slaughter the lamb on the altar.  Furthermore we have no more need of it because it was done once for all at Calvary.  Now our Savior has become our High Priest.  So Jesus transfers that symbolism that was once portrayed by the lamb to the bread.  He references the bread as His body, which was given for us.  Paul makes it clear in 1 Cor. 5:7 that leaven is a picture of sin.  Jesus was the sinless One, offered up for the sinner.  He was the substitute for our sins.  He was the bread of life which came down out of heaven. 

There is another important facet to what Jesus said on this occasion which Luke does not record.  Actually it is the Apostle Paul writing later to the church at Corinth under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit who adds a point of distinction.  And that is found in 1Cor. 11:25-26, “In the same way He took the cup also after supper, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in My blood; do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.’  For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until He comes.”  The point that I want to make is the twice reference to as often as you do this.  Much has been made about the frequency of observing the Lord’s Supper.  Catholics do so at every mass.  Some Protestants do it every week, some every month, and some only at various times in the year.  I would say that the text speaks for itself.  In Exodus the injunction was to observe the Passover once a year in the Spring.  So if you take the text literally, you might say that “as often as you do this” refers to the observation of the Passover, which was once a year.  But there are some theologians that say that the tradition of the early church seems to indicate that they were gathering together to break bread every Lord’s day.  Therefore they say the tradition of the early church was to observe the Lord’s Supper every Sunday. 

But even if that is the case, Paul definitely rebukes the church at Corinth for abusing the practice of the Lord’s Supper.  He says in 1Cor. 11:20-21, “Therefore when you meet together, it is not to eat the Lord's Supper, for in your eating each one takes his own supper first; and one is hungry and another is drunk.”  So if anything, Paul seems to imply that familiarity had dulled the importance of the feast and it had just turned into a substitute meal, rather than symbolic of the substitionary Savior.

So when Jesus offered up the cup, He said, “This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in My blood.”  He had not yet spilled His blood. When He said “this is My body which is given for you,” He had not yet given His body.  He was obviously speaking metaphorically.  He could not be saying that His literal blood was in the cup.  His body was not being eaten that night.  The apostles understood it to be metaphorical.  The bread was symbolic of His body.  The wine was symbolic of His blood.  And so what was clear to them should be equally clear to us.  Jesus was resurrected in His body.  He went up into heaven in His body.  Symbolically we eat the bread, remembering the sacrifice that He made for us that we might be freed from the enslavement and penalty of sin.  Symbolically we drink the wine or juice remembering that His shed blood purchased our redemption.  It ratified a covenant that God had made 2500 years earlier with Abraham that was prefigured in the burning oven and flaming torch that passed between the cut pieces of the sacrificial animals.   God made a covenant then with Abraham that from his seed would come a nation, and from that nation would come a people numbered like the stars of heaven.  It would no longer be a people united by nationality or by heritage or lineage, but united by faith.  Abraham would be the father of the faithful.  Those that would be saved by faith in Christ. 

So Jesus said the cup signifies a new covenant in My blood. Heb. 9:15 says,  “For this reason He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that, since a death has taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were committed under the first covenant, those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.”  It goes on to say that covenants have to be ratified with blood.  This covenant is an everlasting covenant, the supreme covenant, because it was ratified not with the blood of animals, but with the precious blood of the Son of God. 

One last point that I want to leave with you.  And that is that Jesus said in vs. 19, “do this in remembrance of Me.”  Actually, Paul says that He said it twice, after the bread and again after the wine.  Jesus isn’t prescribing a means of grace here.  He is prescribing a way to bring us to remember His ultimate sacrifice for our sins. He is giving us a meal of communion with Him when we remember His sacrifice for us.  When we join in the fellowship of His suffering.  Remembering His love for us should prompt us to love Him in return.  We love Him because He first loved us.  We offer our lives in gratitude as servants of Christ because of His great sacrifice for us.  This remembering of what Christ accomplished should be the motivation for our lives, to live our lives for His glory, in His service. 

We come together as a church, as Christ’s body, to eat together, to fellowship together, to participate in communion together.  And in so doing we recognize that  spiritually we are connected to one another because we have all partaken of His body.   That is the spiritual significance.  That is the symbolism of eating together, Christ’s body makes us all one body in Christ.  This is the New Covenant, that God has provided a way for all men, of every nation and tribe to become part of His church, the bride of Christ, and that one day Christ will come again to reclaim His bride, and we will consummate that relationship at the marriage supper of the Lamb  in the new heaven and new earth.  In the meantime, let us do this, as often as we do it, in remembrance of Jesus. 

That remembrance should inspire in you a desire, as stated in Romans 12:1, to present your body as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.  We don’t remember Christ’s supreme sacrifice so that we can continue in a life of selfishness, a life of self gratification.  Paul said if we do that we come to the Lord’s table unworthily.  And as such we come under judgment, because we have not properly examined ourselves.  So as we remember what Christ has done for us as the Passover Lamb, we should consecrate ourselves to live holy lives in His service.  Paul says in Romans that is our spiritual service of worship.  Listen, salvation wasn’t cheap, therefore worship shouldn’t be cheap either.  It’s not lip service that God wants, it’s a life of service as a living sacrifice.  That is the proper response of those that properly observe the Lord’s Supper.  Let’s do this in remembrance of Him, by living our lives in service as gratitude for Him.  

No comments:

Post a Comment